|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.18 02:59:00 -
[1]
I had planned and invested quite a lot to training for the naglfar. I was quite happy with the boost they gave but now.... sigh...
is there any way this can be a good ship still or do i just train for amarr?
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.19 01:05:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Roemy Schneider
Originally by: Ernst Ra'Kun I had planned and invested quite a lot to training for the naglfar. I was quite happy with the boost they gave but now.... sigh...
is there any way this can be a good ship still or do i just train for amarr?
if the hel remains to be the only mom with an explosion radius bonus to fighter bombers, it could very well be the only minnie capital with an edge.
Truly? Hopefully that lasts a while. I'm beginning to feel theres a lack of hope for going to... bigger minmatar ships. Anyways, though not wanting to turn up the heat on this a lot more, I am curious to know if many people did feel the current 7.5% RoF and Dmg to XL projectile is considered somewhat ...over powered? (personally it looked nice to me)
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.20 01:18:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kraken Kill Why cant a Dread that has 4! Dread weapons be the Dread which does the most DPS?
why is it always the Amarr who do the most DPS followed by the Gallente? All minmatar dread pilots will need to train Citadel cruise now. uh why do i even bother posting. might as well talk to myself while i play navyfield.
i find myself gleefully reading this one.
why indeed hmm? i have to agree that the 4 weapons slots as a defining thing abt the naglfar (aside also from the fact that it is the only VERTICAL dread, but dats another matter ) it shud deal good amount of dps, though of course not overly so. But again, I also have to ask another thing coz i havent been on sisi or such, are the new proposed XL projectile changes that good that the nag needs this severe a nerf?
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 18:21:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Arramis Edited by: Arramis on 21/11/2009 12:34:59
Linkage - this explains everithing.
lol.... funny
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.26 14:45:00 -
[5]
... if everyone goes amarr, till the point dat the game is filled with just amarr ships, maybe then devs would look at fixing the other ships?
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.27 20:37:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Max Hardcase There would be no need then, if everyone only flies Amarr then by definition everyone would be one the same playing field.
haha like so... quite balanced it will be... heheh
but what i meant is that if all other ships are unused, CCP might feel the need to boost em up so as to attract people to use em again...
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.11.28 05:56:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Kalia Masaer And sadly we will end up with a new flavor of the year and amarr ships will become obsolete, while one of the other races becomes the hands down top dog.
ur probably right.... still, im trying to think when CCP has ever got it to a point where every faction feels balanced out with each other... or will they always have a ..flavor of the year?
oh well... save the naglfar!
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.12.03 11:58:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Dursun Idris
Originally by: Wildest Edited by: Wildest on 03/12/2009 11:00:25 i think i know what CCP is trying to do to all minmatar pilots...they want us to fly only Command ships or lower ...and maybe the occasional BS....couse frankly at the way minmatar caps are now u would be better off flying a Sleipnir into combat..as it would prolly do more dmg to the other fleet then ur naglfar...
my 2 cents
I agree your opinion that they are on the way to remove minmatar caps. But at least, minmatar BS's got a reason to deploy now, both with ac's and arties... But i feel a nerfbat coming soon to ac faloff :( (After i saw easyly obtainable 90km faloff - can go to 130 and 150 with fantasy setups - on AC's)
i certainly hope not... while my plans to go naglfar might be questionable now, im at least enjoying my minmatar BS
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.12.06 03:29:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Ernst Ra''Kun on 06/12/2009 03:32:12 I doubt we'll hear much from devs; a super 60 page threadnought (that gets censored a lot) on capitals can barely get more than 3 or 4 replies, which are somewhat unsatisfying to the players still... I am uncertain also as to how effective it can be, but since it was thru CSM the 3 month or so boost for the nag was obtained, there be a thread there in Assembly Hall that is looking for support to get csm to bring up the issue to ccp (again).
I don't know much abt XL projectiles, but if all other projectiles are any indication (loving the minmatar subcaps), it does feel projectiles have been brought up a bit, though not too much. I wonder if this is really the thing that ccp nozh said wud make it into a 'monster'. has anyone tested to see if XL arties are in anyway super enough to be a .... monster maker?
(hoping some way can still make naglfar ..usable..)
|
Ernst Ra'Kun
|
Posted - 2009.12.22 01:20:00 -
[10]
I read this post by CCP abathur...just read first few pages, anyhow....
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1236843
but it did state the naglfar will have its "Launcher RoF bonus removed and Turret RoF bonus (5%) added"
i guess this is... good.... hope to see the people who can crunch out numbers prove this is good enuff
|
|
|
|
|